Obama Attorney Admits in Open Court That Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Forgery
I can see you have a puzzled look on your face and you are asking why the lawyer would admit that. The case was in New Jersey and was forced by a recent ballot challenge. Alexandra Hill a legal associate with the law firm Genova, Burn, & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, took a desperate attempt at explaining away the fraudulent document by saying that, even though it is a forgery, that alone isn’t enough to say that President Obama isn’t eligible to be President.
I can see you are really shaking your head now! Ok follow with me on this twisted logic. Hill explained that his popularity and landslide victory in 2008 alone should be enough to secure his seat as President. Because he never claimed that the birth certificate was the actual legal document that proved his citizenship, the forgery label is a separate issue that has to be decided later. She went on to say that the State of New Jersey in no way describes the qualifications for a candidate to be a prerequisite to being added to the ballot, that requirement rests entirely with the federal verbiage.
The Daily Pen Editor, Penbrook Johannson opines ; “Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified, Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed. However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that reason.”
According to Johannson, there is an overwhelming level of moral certainty that Obama is a usurper, but until a court with jurisdiction considers this case, Obama’s status as a legitimate president is in limbo.
Unfortunately Judge Masin denied the motion to remove Obama from the ballot. This all took place on April 10, 2012, this merely takes up precious time and until Obama is found to be an active participant in the presentation of governmental document forgery, the admission will go nowhere.
Fortunately this admission lends credibility to Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona’s cold case posse’s report on the birth certificate investigation. It also gives a degree of credibility to all the conservative stalwarts that have claimed from the presentation of this document that it is in fact a forgery.
What kind of country uses Supreme Court judges to claim constantly that the American people have “no standing” to question the eligibility of a President, even after his attorney has admitted that the single supporting document has now been declared a forgery? Not one case has been heard on the merits, only denied as to “standing.”
It’s about time we ALL stand up and be counted on this issue of a usurper leading our country to destruction!
UPDATE:Judge Jeff S. Masin who heard the argument ruled in a written opinion on the same day that New Jersey law does not require Obama to produce ANY proof he is eligible to be president in order to be placed on the primary ballot.
Masin prevented the petitioner’s counsel, Mario Apuzzo, from placing Obama’s birth certificate into evidence. Apuzzo wasn’t even allowed to call to the stand a witness offering expert testimony that Obama’s birth certificate is a FORGERY despite his correct argument that Obama, according to the Constitution, has to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met the burden of proof to show that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot!